Focusing on what matters in Aid-for-Trade: Increasing effectiveness and delivering results

This Briefing Papers draws on a review that suggests Aid for Trade (AfT) is subject to the same failures of collective action that affect aid in many other sectors. It discusses the success criteria that help to determine the effectiveness of AfT barriers and opportunities, design and implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. It concludes with the following suggestions:

• Demand for specific AfT projects must be driven by the recipient country, and AfT must address barriers to trade in a measurable way.
• Improving understanding of the nature and causes of coordination failures and information asymmetries specific to the political economy of recipient countries and regions, as well as donor agencies.
• Given that trade is, by definition, cross-border, there is a strong economic rationale to strengthen regional institutions as well as for more investment in trans-national corridor approaches.
• Investing in the collection of baseline data and providing measurable outcomes (e.g. port clearance time; trade volumes) would help to address concerns about attribution.